More Information

Submitted: November 18, 2024 | Approved: November 29, 2024 | Published: November 30, 2024

How to cite this article: Hand MJ, Abib CF, Tabi KM, Nouck AE, Tonfack LB, Taffouo VD, et al. Plant growth, Yield and Leaf Nutritional value of Jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) as Influenced by Banana Peel levels under Salt Stress conditions in Coastal region of Cameroon. J Plant Sci Phytopathol. 2024; 8(3): 131-140. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001145

DOI: 10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001145

Copyright License: © 2024 Hand MJ, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Keywords: Antioxidant; Banana peel; Osmolytes; Jute; Salinity

Acronyms: ASA: Ascorbic Acid; BP: Banana Peel; Ca: Calcium; CHL: Chlorophyll; DAP: Days After Planting; DAS: Days After Sowing; LDW: Leaf Dry Weight; LFW: Leaf Fresh Weight; LRWC: Leaf Relative Water Content; LY: Leave Yield; MDA: Malondialdehyde; Mg: Magnesium; N: Nitrogen; NL: Nnumber of Leaf; C: Organic Carbon; P: Phosphorus; PH: Plant height; K: Potassium; Na: sodium; SP: Soluble Protein; SD: Stem Diameter; S: Sulfur; TFC: Total Flavonoids Content; TLA: Total Leaf Area; TP: Total Phenol; TSS: Total Soluble Sugar; WAS: Week After Sowing; Zn: Zinc

 FullText PDF

Plant growth, Yield and Leaf Nutritional value of Jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) as Influenced by Banana Peel levels under Salt Stress conditions in Coastal region of Cameroon

Mathias Julien Hand1*, Chimène Fanta Abib1, Kingsley Mbi Tabi2, Alphonse Ervé Nouck2, Libert Brice Tonfack4, Victor Désiré Taffouo3 and Emmanuel Youmbi4

1Department of Biological Science, Faculty of Science, University of Maroua, P.O. BOX 46 Maroua, Cameroon
2Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Bamenda, P.O. Box 39 Bambili Cameroon
3Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Douala, P.O. Box 24157 Douala, Cameroon
4Laboratory of Biotechnology and Environment, Department of Biology and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Yaoundé I, P.O. BOX 812 Yaoundé, Cameroon

*Address for Correspondence: Hand Mathias Julien, University of Maroua, Faculty of Science, Department of Biological Science, P.O. BOX 46 Maroua, Cameroon, Email: handmaty@gmail.com

In the world, millions of hectares of cultivated land are affected by salt, making salinity a major constraint for plant production.

The effects of different levels of banana peel on growth, yield, and chemical changes of jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) under salt stress were examined herein. Response of jute to applications of different levels of banana peel (5, 10, and 15 t ha-1), as well as water irrigation salinity at 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl were evaluated under greenhouse conditions.

The outcome uncovered that salinity caused significant reduction of plant growth and yield parameters, chlorophyll (at 21.6%), LRWC (at 18.9%), P (at 57.1%) and K (at 45.4%) content, while MDA content (at 351.8%), Na (at 266%), soluble proteins (70.2%), total phenolic (at 23.4%) accumulation showed an increase from 0 to 200 mM NaCl without BP application. The banana peel treatments (at 15 t ha-1 under 200 mM NaCl) diminished significantly damaging effects caused by salinity via a reduction in the Na (at 28.4%), total soluble sugars (at 17.8%), total flavonoids (at 20.1%), which enhanced number of leaves per plant (37.1%), plant height (at 19.8%), leave yield (at 41.4%), LRWC (at 12.8%), Mg (at 24.2%) and reduced the MDA content (at 20%), presenting a favorable effect in reducing the oxidative stress that emerged from salt stress.

It could be concluded, that the application of 15 t ha-1 of BP was superior in promoting plant growth, yield, and nutritional quality than others under control and in the saline soils in this study. BP at 15 t ha-1 had a more reduced damage of salt stress effect on growth, yield, nutritional value, and use efficiency.

Jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) is an annual flowering plant in the Tiliaceae family and the most significant source of natural fiber, covering about 80% of global bast fiber production [1]. Its leaves are in abundance of iron, folate, protein, fiber, calcium, riboflavin, carotene, vitamin C, and phenols, and have high zinc bioavailability and appreciable amounts of other proximate components. And minerals [2]. Cooked leaves and tender shoots that are eaten along with food staples are recommended for pregnant and nursing mothers because of their high iron content [3]. Health-flourishing effects of plant-derived secondary metabolites in human health, including antioxidative, anticarcinogenic, antibiotic, and pharmacological effects, are well documented [4]. Leaves of C. olitorius possess an abundance of antioxidant compounds associated with various biological properties, which include diuretic, analgesic, antipyretic, and antimicrobial activities, antitumor [5] and phenolic antioxidative compounds [6], hypoglycemic [7], antiobesity [8] and gastroprotective [9].

However, salinity is a significant abiotic stress factor that threatens agriculture in both arid and semiarid environments. It affects over 20% of irrigated land worldwide, and 40% of the food produced around the world is impacted by increased amounts of salt, as the amount of land affected by salinity is on the rise. It is also estimated that 50% of the cultivable land will be affected due to salinity by 2050 [10]. Salt stress induces changes in the biochemical, physiological, and morphological responses of a plant, which leads to reduced growth, yield, biomass, and quality of crop plants. Salinity's significant inhibitory impact on plant growth and yield was due to: (1) osmotic influence, (2) ion toxicity, and (3) nutritional deficiency leading to decreased photosynthetic efficacy and other physiological disorders [11]. Salinity causes excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, possibly resulting in enzyme inactivation, damage to DNA, lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and interaction with other essential plant cell components. Two solutions can be chosen for sustainable agriculture in salt soils: planting salt crops or using salt-soil recovery methods.

Various organic improvements such as garden compost, green manure, farmyard manure, and urban solid waste compost have been applied to soil to increase soil quality and crop yields [12]. As chemical fertilizers are both expensive and have dangerous effects, the use of organic compound solutions is on the rise. Organic fertilizers result in improved soil composition and increased availability of nutrients, which support quality and yield protection, and they are less expensive than synthetic ones [13]. Adding organic waste to the soil, which reduces evaporation, while moderating the temperature of the soil, reduces stress on the roots of the plant and supplies nutrients, which in turn, results in productivity enhancement [14]. Moreover [15], reported that organic foods are significantly more nutritious than conventional foods and these had fewer pesticide residues and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Organic manure has been reported to improve fruit and vegetable bioactive compound contents, such as beta-carotene, flavonoids, lycopene, and phenol, as well as antioxidant activity [16]. [17] suggested that organic manures could be the safest way to preserve soil fertility, sustainability, and salt resistance. Various ecological improvements including farmyard manure, compost, Banana Peel (BP), and Poultry Manure (PM) can be used to reinforce saline soils. Banana peels contain the three macronutrients: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium, as well as many micronutrients, which promote the growth of garden plants from seed germination to blooms and fruits. Because of these nutrients, banana peels also help plants to resist diseases [18]. Organic improvements enhance soil physical, mechanical, and biological properties under saline conditions.

The objective of this study is to determine the optimum level of banana peel application for maximum growth, yield, chemical compositions, and quality of jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) left under salt stress. Yield, chemical, quality, and growth indicators were measured to determine the effects of the banana peel on jute in comparison with the control to determine if successful cultivation of this wild vegetable requires the use of fertilizers and the quantities that produce favorable results under the salt stress conditions in the littoral region of Cameroon.

Experimental site

The experimentation took place in 2021 at the University of Douala research farm (4°01N, 9°44 E, 13 m.a.s.l.), in the coastal region of Cameroon. The climate belongs to the equatorial domain of a particular type called Cameroonian characteristics by two seasons with a lengthy rainy season (at least 9 months), abundant rainfalls (about 3597 mm per year), and high and stable temperatures (26.7 °C). The relative humidity remains high the whole year and near 100%. The soil of the experimental site is classified as yellow ferralitic soil.

Plant growth conditions and treatment

Jute potager (Corchorus olitorius L.) has been used as plant material. Seeds were provided by the breeding program of the TECHNISEM (SEMAGRI, Douala). The seeds were surface sterilized with 3% sodium hypochlorite for 20 min and washed four times with deionized water. The seeds were planted in cavity trays in the greenhouse of the Faculty of Science at the University of Douala, Cameroon, on 11th April 2021 and transplanted when seedlings reached 8 cm in height into the prepared polythene bags containing 5 kg of sterilized soil. Each pot of seven liters capacity is perforated at the bottom to allow unimpeded drainage. The pots were arranged in a complete randomized design with one plant per pot and four replicates per treatment. The plants were watered immediately after transplanting to avoid drought stress. All plants were fertilized daily with a modified nutrient solution (in g L-1): 150 g Ca(NO3)2, 70 g KNO3, 15 g Fe-EDTA, 0.14 g KH2PO4, 1.60 g K2SO4, 11 g MgSO4, 2.5 g CaSO4, 1.18 g MnSO4, 0.16 g ZnSO4, 3.10 g H3BO4, 0.17 g CuSO4 and 0.08 g MoO3 [19]. The pH of the nutrient solution was adjusted to 7.0 by adding HNO3 0.1 mM. For the determination of agro morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses to salt stress, the jute potager was subjected to 0 (control), 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl. Plants were watered with deionized water every morning. The amendment in each case was applied 5 WAS with four fertilization rates (0, 5, 10, and 15 t h-1) each of Banana peel and 300 kg h-1 of NPK (15 – 15 – 15). The banana peel was collected in the study area from a banana farmer, dried, and ground. Selected banana peel chemical properties are shown in Table 1. Phytosanitary treatment has been realized with Emamectine benzoate (insecticide) used before the transplantation of plants and Thiophanate-methyl (fungicide).

Table 1: Nutrient contents of banana peel dry and ground (BP).
 Nutrient concentration (%)  
Nutrient source N Iron P Na K Ca Mg C/N
BP 2.04 0.62 0.28 0.027 1.91 0.58 1.44 24.83
Soil moisture content determination, banana peel sampling and analysis

Soil samples were collected from representative spots on the experimental site from where soil was collected for potting using soil auger to a depth of 20 cm, the samples were made into a sample. A sub-sample was taken, air-dried, crushed, and sieved with a 2-mm mesh sieve after which physical and chemical analyses were carried out (Table 2). The following chemical analyses were done on the soil, tap water, and banana peel (Tables 1-3). Organic carbon (C), was determined by the wet oxidation procedure [20] and Total Nitrogen (N) by the micro-Kjeldahl digestion method. Magnesium (Mg) was extracted using the Mehlich 3 method and determined by auto ANALYSER 5Technicon 2). The total and available soil phosphorus (P) were determined by the method of [21]. The soil was measured potentiometrically in a 1:2.5 soil: water mixture. Calcium (Ca), potassium (K), and sodium (Na) were determined by an aflame photometer (JENWAY) as described by [22]. Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, HCO3-, SO42-, NO3-, and Cl- content in the water tap was determined by using the colorimetric amperometric titration method [23] (Table 3). Electric conductivity and pH were determined by conductometer.

Table 2: Physical and chemical characteristics of soil used.
Physio-chemical properties Quantity
Clay % 14.21 ± 1.98
Coarse sand% 27.93 ± 2.76
Fine sand% 25.72 ± 2.58
Coarse silt % 26.02 ± 2.71
Fine silt % 6.31 ± 0.53
Total carbon % 0.77 ± 0.09
Total nitrogen % 0.33 ± 0.06
Ratio C/N % 2.33 ± 0.08
Moisture (%) 1.01 ± 0,12
Phosphorus (ppm) 4,82 ± 0.17
Potassium (g kg-1) 0.26 ± 0.08
Sodium (g kg-1) 2.8 ± 0.19
Calcium (g kg-1) 0.33 ± 0.08
Magnésium (g kg-1) 0.17 ± 0.07
pH 8.47 ± 0.62
EC dS/m 2.24 dS-1
Table 3: Chemical characteristics of irrigation water.
Chemical characteristics
Irrigation
Water
Ca2+
(mg g-1)
Mg2+
(mg g-1)
K+
(mg g-1)
HCO3- (mg g-1) Na+
(mg g-1)
SO42-
(mg g-1)
Cl-
(mg g-1)
Ph CE
(dS m-1)
Tap water 233.2 116.8 23.4 61.7 438.1 518.8 26.1 7.31 1.34
Plant measurements

Seedlings were harvested 14 WAS by carefully removing and washing the soil particles from the roots, after which the plant parts were separated into shoots and roots [24]. The tissues (leaves) were dried for 24 h at 105 ˚C [22]. The dry samples were weighted. Plant samples were harvested after 4 months of culture and under 10 weeks of water stress, the plant was collected to determine agro morphological characters (number of leave per plant, stem diameter, total leaf area, fresh leave weight, dry leave weight, plant height, leave yield) in jute (Corchorus olitorius L.).

The relative water content (RWC) in the leaf was recorded according to the formula as follows: RWC = (FFW - FDW)/ (TW - FDW) × 100, where FFW is fresh weight, FDW is dry weight, TW is turgid weight and TLA (length × width × 0.80 × total number of leaves × 0.662) were calculated using the methodology described by [25]. Fresh leaves were extracted with acetone (80%) (Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC) and placed for one hour at 5 ºC. The extractions were centrifuged for 15 min at 3,000 x g. Chlorophyll a and b content were measured with a spectrophotometer (Helios UVG1702E, England) at wavelengths 663, 647, and 470 nm, respectively. Chlorophyll was measured according to the method of [26]. The calculation was done according to the following equations: Chlorophyll a = 12.70 × A663 – 2.79 × A647.

Chlorophyll b = 20 × A647 – 4.62 × A663

Total chlorophyll = Chlorophyll a + Chlorophyll b

Osmolyte contents

For the measurement of Total Soluble Sugar (TSS), a modified phenolsulfuric assay was used [27]. Subsamples (100 mg) of dry leaves were placed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes. 20 mL of extracting solution (glacial acetic acid: methanol: water, 1:4:15 (v/v/v)) was added to the ground tissue and homogenized for 15 sec at 16000 rpm. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 mn and the supernatant was decanted to a 125 ml Erlenmeyer flask. The residue was resuspended in 20 mL of extracting solution and centrifuged for another 5 min. The supernatant was decanted, combined with the original extract, and made up to 100 mL with water. One mL of 5% (v/v) phenol solution and 5 mL of concentrated H2SO4 were added to 1 mL aliquots of SS (reconstituted with 1 mL water). The mixture was shaken and cooled to room temperature, and absorbance was recorded at 490 nm wavelength with a spectrophotometer (Pharmaspec UV-1700 model). The amount of TSS present in the extract was calculated using a standard curve prepared from graded concentrations of glucose.

Soluble Protein content (SP) was determined by the method of [28]. Briefly, the appropriate volume (from 0 - 100 µl) of the sample was aliquoted into a tube and the total volume was adjusted to 100 µl with distilled water. A 1 ml of Bradford working solution was added to each sample well. Then the mixture was thoroughly mixed by a vortex mixer. After left for 2 min, the absorbance was read at 595 nm. The standard curve was established by replacing the sample portions in the tubes with proper serial dilutions of bovine serum albumin.

Malondialdehyde (MDA) was assayed following the method of [29]. About 0.5 g of fresh leaf was ground in 0.1% trichloroacetic acid, then mixed and centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min to prepare for the MDA extraction. After that, 1 mL supernatant with 4 mL 0.5% thiobarbituric acid (containing 20% trichloroacetic acid) was heated at 95 ◦C for 15 min and then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 15 min. Then the sample was recorded for absorption at 600, 532 and 450 nm and MDA content was calculated.

Antioxidant compounds

For estimation of Ascorbic Acid Content (ASA), 1 g of frozen leaf tissues was homogenized in 5 mL of ice-cold 6% m-phosphoric acid (pH 2.8) containing 1 mM EDTA [30]. The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through a 30-µm syringe filter, and 50 µL of the filtrate was analyzed using an HPLC system (PerkinElmer series 200 LC and UV/VIS detector 200 LC, USA) equipped with a 5-µm column (Spheri-5 RP-18; 220 × 4.6 mm; Brownlee) and UV detection at 245 nm with 1.0 mL/min water (pH: 2.2) as the mobile phase, run isocratically [31].

The total phenolic (TP) content of the extract was determined by the Folin Ciocalteu method [32]. Subsamples (1 g) of fresh leaves were ground at 4 °C in 3 mL of 0.1 N HCl. After incubation at 4 °C for 20 min, the homogenate was centrifuged at 6000 g for 40 min. The supernatant was collected, the pellet was re-suspended in 3 mL of 0.1 N HCl, and centrifuged as previously. The two supernatants are mixed and constitute the crude extract of soluble phenol. The reaction mixture containing 15 µL of extract, 100 µL Folin-Ciocalteu reagents, and 0.5 mL of 20% Na2CO3 was incubated at 40 °C for 20 min and absorbance read at 720 nm wavelength with a spectrophotometer (Pharmaspec UV-1700 model). A standard curve was established using chlorogenic acid. TP content was expressed as mg g-1 fresh weight.

The Total Flavonoid Content (TFC) of crude extract was determined by the aluminum chloride colorimetric method [33]. 50 µL of crude extract (1 mg/mL ethanol) was made up to 1 mL with methanol, mixed with 4 mL of distilled water, and then 0.3 mL of 5% NaNO2 solution; 0.3 mL of 10% AlCl3 solution was added after 5 min of incubation, and the mixture was allowed to stand for 6 min. Then, 2 mL of 1 mol/L NaOH solution was added, and the final volume of the mixture was brought to 10 mL with double-distilled water. The mixture was allowed to stand for 15 min, and absorbance was recorded on a spectrophotometer (Pharmaspec UV-1700 model) at 510 nm wavelength. FLA content was calculated from a rutin calibration curve, and the result was expressed as g rutin equivalent per g dry weight.

Nutrient content

K, Na, Mg, and P contents in the leaf tissue of the plants were evaluated in dry, ground, and digested samples in a CEM microwave oven [34]. P was determined by colorimetry; potassium by flame photometry; sodium and magnesium by atomic absorption spectrometry [35]. Iron and zinc contents were determined by the method reported in [36]. The leaf of the jute potager was dry ashed at 450 °C for 2 hours and digested on a heat cave with 10 ml HNO3 1 M. The solution was filtrated and adjusted at 100 ml with HNO3 at 1/100 and analyzed with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Rayleigh, WFX-100).

Experimental design and statistical analysis

The experiment was conducted as a factorial completely randomized design with four NaCl treatments and four levels of banana peel in four replications. Data are presented in terms of mean ( ± standard deviation). All data were statistically analyzed using Statistica (version 9, Tulsa, OK, USA) and first subjected to analyses of variance (ANOVA). Statistical differences between treatment means were established using the Fisher LSD test at p < 0.05.

Influence of banana peel application and NaCl on growth, chlorophyll, leaf relative water content, and yield characteristics

Corchorus olitorius according to the different treatments (saline and banana peel) shown in Table 4. The average PH, NL, TLA, SD, LFW, LDW, and LY increased as levels of banana peel application increased and decreased as the levels of salt stress. Higher growth and yield values were obtained at 15 h-1 BP and non-saline irrigation: 60.1 cm, 28.1, 65.1 cm2, 2.85 cm, 10.7 g plant-1, 4.2 g plant-1 and 8.3 t ha-1 respectively PH, NL, TLA, SD, LFW, LDW and LY. Lower values of growth and yield were recorded at unfertilized treatment (0 h-1 BP) and under 200 mM NaCl: 32.3 cm, 40.3, 50.5 cm2, 2.28 cm, 5.2 g plant-1, 1.4 g plant-1 and 4.1 t ha-1 respectively PH, NL, TLA, SD, LFW, LDW and LY (Table 4). Under salt stress (200 mM NaCl) chlorophyll content was reduced by 21.58% compared to control plants (Figure 3A). The application of organic matter (at 15 h-1 BP) resulted in the increase of chlorophyll content with non-saline by 12.67% and under salt stress (at 200 mM NaCl) by 11.84%. The application of NPK under salt stress (at 200 mM NaCl) led to a lower effect on protecting LRWC losses and resulted in increases in the LRWC by 2.76%. While LRWC values decreased under salt stress (at 200 mM NaCl) by 17.64% in salty plants without BP, the organic matter applications (15 h-1 BP) to LRWC demonstrated an increase of 11% in the same conditions (Figure 3B).

Table 4: Effects of banana peel rates on growth and yield characters of jute potager (Corchorus olitorius L.) under salt stress (14 WAS).
 Growth and yield parameters
Treatment (mM NaCl) BP
(t ha-1)
PH
(cm)
NL TLA
(cm²)
SD
(cm)
LFW
(g)
LDW
(g)
LY (t ha-1)
Control 0 49.3 ± 0.02d 29.2 ± 0.71g 54.4 ± 2.24c 2.58 ± 0.12m 8.9 ± 0.12k 3.1 ± 0.91lm 7.4 ± 0.91kl
NPK 52.8 ± 0.02c 32.2 ± 0.71g 57.3 ± 2.24b 2.69 ± 0.12m 9.3 ± 0.12k 3.3 ± 0.91lm 7.6 ± 0.91kl
5 50.3 ± 0.03d 30.1 ± 0.82h 56.3 ± 3.01b 2.68 ± 0.16m 9.2 ± 0.16k 3.2 ± 0.08lm 7.5 ± 0.08kl
10 54.7 ± 0.02c 34.9 ± 0.81g 59.5 ± 3.21b 2.77 ± 0.23m 9.8 ± 0.23k 3.6 ± 0.07lm 7.8 ± 0.07kl
15 60.1 ± 0.04b 40.3 ± 0.93f 65.1 ± 3.33a 2.85 ± 0.41m 10.7 ± 0.41k 4.2 ± 0.11l 8.3 ± 0.11k
  50 0 47.5 ± 0.03d 27.8 ± 0.88h 51.6 ± 2.67c 2.36 ± 0.21m 7.5 ± 0.21kl 2.4 ± 0.12jk 5.1 ± 0.12l
NPK 50.8 ± 0.02d 30.2 ± 0.71h 54.3 ± 2.24c 2.41 ± 0.12m 7.7 ± 0.12kl 2.6 ± 0.91jk 5.3 ± 0.91l
5 48.6 ± 0.06cd 28.6 ± 0.76h 53.3 ± 2.34c 2.39 ± 0.32m 7.7 ± 0.32kl 2.6 ± 0.09jk 5.3 ± 0.09l
10 52.4 ± 0.04c 33.7 ± 0.67g 57.4 ± 2.88b 2.58 ± 0.28m 8.3 ± 0.28k 2.9 ± 0.13jk 5.6 ± 0.13l
15 57.2 ± 0.05b 37.6 ± 0.59f 61.9 ± 3.45ab 2.64 ± 0.25m 9.5 ± 0.25k 3.4 ± 0.07lm 6.1 ± 0.07l
  100 0 39.9 ± 0.02f 24.5 ± 0.62gh 48.3 ± 3.12d 2.05 ± 0.17m 5.6 ± 0.17l 1.5 ± 0.11k 4.5 ± 0.11l
NPK 41.8 ± 0.02ef 26.2 ± 0.71hi 50.2 ± 2.24d 2.16 ± 0.12m 5.9 ± 0.12l 1.8 ± 0.91k 4.6 ± 0.91l
5 40.8 ± 0.07f 25.2 ± 0.73i 49.3 ± 2.88d 2.14 ± 0.44m 5.8 ± 0.44l 1.8 ± 0.09k 4.6 ± 0.09l
10 42.3 ± 0.07e 28.6 ± 0.75h 52.9 ± 4.01c 2.22 ± 0.59m 6.2 ± 0.59l 1.9 ± 0.14k 4.8 ± 0.14j
15 46.8 ± 0.03de 32.1 ± 0.82f 56.7 ± 3.45bc 2.31 ± 0.38m 6.8 ± 038l 3.1 ± 0.06lm 5.2 ± 0.06l
  200 0 32.3 ± 0.06g 20.5 ± 0.78j 44.2 ± 2.66e 1.88 ± 0.58m 4.05 ± 0.58l 0.8 ± 0.05ln 2.9 ± 0.05jk
NPK 33.8 ± 0.02g 22.2 ± 0.71i 46.3 ± 2.24de 1.96 ± 0.12m 4.2 ± 0.12l 0.96 ± 0.91n 3.3 ± 0.91lm
5 32.7 ± 0.7g 21.6 ± 0.84ij 45.5 ± 2.33e 2.07 ± 0.62m 4.1 ± 0.62l 0.93 ± 0.82n 3.2 ± 0.11lm
10 34.5 ± 0.03g 24.4 ± 0.79i 47.4 ± 3.04d 2.19 ± 0.49m 4.5 ± 0.49l 1.2 ± 0.12m 3.6 ± 0.12lm
15 38.7 ± 0.04f 28.1 ± 0.76h 50.5 ± 3.23d 2.28 ± 0.76m 5.2 ± 0.76l 1.4 ± 0.11n 4.1 ± 0.11l
 Two-way ANOVA results  
Salt stress (SS) ** ** ** NS * NS *
Banana peel (BP) * * * * * * *
Interaction BP x SS * * * NS * NS *
Values shown are means (n = 5) ± SD; within columns, means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
**, *significant at 1 and 5% probability levels, respectively, NS: Not Significant

Download Image

Figure 3: Effects of banana peel rates on total chlorophyll and leaf relative water content of jute potager (Corchorus olitorius L.) under salt stress (50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl) at 14 WAS. Total chlorophyll (A) and leaf relative water content (B). Bars are means (n = 5) ± SD. Means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

Salinity in soils diminished plant growth and yield by affecting three major physiological metabolic pathways: osmotic, ionic, and oxidative stresses [37]. The addition of BP significantly (p < 0.05) promoted the growth and yield at different levels of saline treatment. Soil amendments with organic manures reduce the toxic effects of salinity in various plant species such as alfalfa [12]. [17] reported that the increase in plant growth and yield parameters with organic matter was mainly due to the reason more concentrated nutrients or minerals were made readily available and easily absorbable by the receiving plants leading to faster growth and development. The organic matter (BP) may affect plant growth and yield as a source of growth promoters, auxin, vitamins, and amino acids which act on the vegetative growth, yield, and quality of the plant product [38,39]. The most negative leaf water and stem water potential values were observed in plants subjected to water and salinity stress, because passive dehydration, as well as the accumulation of salt, plays a role in decreasing the water potential in leaves [22,40].

Even though the application of NaCl decreased the photosynthetic pigment contents of the seedlings, the application of organic matter limited those decreases. [41], reported that the increased chlorophyll accumulation in organic fertilizers, even at a decreased rate, could be the result of the cooperative effects of the consortium, which facilitates plant N, P, and K uptake better, resulting in increased chlorophyll accumulation. [42], reported that organic fertilizer can increase the pigment of chlorophyll concentration, leaf relative water content, growth, and yield parameters in Talinum triangulare (jacq.) Willd.

Effects of banana peel application and salinity on osmolytes and antioxidant compounds

SP and TSS content were significantly affected by BP and NaCl treatment (p < 0.05). Application of BP significantly increased SP and TSS content under salt stress and the maximum content was produced at 15 h-1 BP and 200 mM NaCl (46.7 g kg-1 and 82.1 g kg-1 respectively) and the lowest value obtained at control (Figures 1A, 1B). The salt stress x banana peel interaction was significant (p < 0.05) at 15 h-1 BP and 200 mM NaCl (Figure 1). MDA content was significantly increased as the levels of salt stress increased (p < 0.05). On the contrary, the application of BP reduced MDA content. 200 mM NaCl without BP showed a higher content of MDA (5.15 nmol g-1 FW) than other treatments at 100 and 50 mM NaCl with 4.04 and 1.83 nmol g-1 FW respectively (Figure 1C).


Download Image

Figure 1: Effects of banana peel rates on osmolytes of jute potager (Corchorus olitorius L.) under salt stress (50, 100 and 200 mM NaCl) at 14 WAS. Soluble proteins (A), total soluble sugars (B) and malondialdehyde (C). Bars are means (n = 5) ± SD. Means followed by different letter are significantly different (p < 0.05).

The NaCl treatments at 50, 100, and 200 nM decreased ASA content by 9.13%, 19.49%, and 31.35%, respectively, when compared to salt stress alone with control. Application of BP from 0 to 15 t ha-1 increased ASA content without salt stress at 3.21% and increased ASA content at 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl to 3.33%, 7.23%, and 7.37% respectively (Figure 2A). TP and TFC of jute do not significantly change at low NaCl levels (50 mM NaCl), while they significantly increase with the increase of NaCl concentrations of the nutrient solution from 100 to 200 mM NaCl. Application of BP increased significantly TP and TFC contents at 5, 10, and 15 t ha-1 levels with or without NaCl treatment (Figure 2B and 2C). The highest amount of TP and TFC were observed at 15 t ha-1 BP under 200 mM NaCl (466.1 mg GAB g-1 MS and 73.5 mg QE g-1 MS respectively).


Download Image

Figure 2: Effects of banana peel rates on antioxidant compound of jute potager (Corchorus olitorius L.) under salt stress (50, 100 and 200 mM NaCl) at 14 WAS. Ascorbic acid (A), total phenol (B) and total flavonoid content (C). Bars are means (n = 5) ± SD. Means followed by different letter are significantly different (p < 0.05).

The osmotic substances, such as SP and TSS that were regulated by fertilizers, could enhance water uptake by increasing the positive osmotic potential in soil, which could trigger chemical signaling that leads to increased stomatal aperture and photosynthetic rate [43,44]. Increased BP supplementation proved much more effective in improving the osmolyte accumulation reflected in the maintenance of growth and hence the amelioration of salinity stress-mediated growth retardation. Increased accumulation of SP and TSS significantly prevents salinity-induced photosynthetic inhibition [37]. Tissue concentration of compatible solutes is maintained either by irreversible synthesis of the compounds or by a combination of synthesis and degradation, and the accumulation of osmolytes is proportional to the external osmolarity [45]. Osmolytes protect the structure and the osmotic balance of cells by maintaining the water influx [46]. Accumulated osmolytes assist in quick growth recovery after stress release [47]. BP application in plants grown declined the MDA levels under salt stress. MDA, which plays the role of a cellular toxicity bioindicator, is a well-known oxidation that emerges from lipid peroxidation during oxidative stress [48]. In this study, the lipid peroxidation of jute increased with salt stress. At the same time, MDA organic matter contents, especially in the BP treatment group, were lower than the contents of seedlings in the NPK treatment group. The results showed that the BP treatments reduced MDA levels, presenting a favorable effect in reducing the oxidative stress that emerged from salt stress.

The reports describing the BP availability-induced regulation of the antioxidant system are scanty and further studies can be handy in understanding the actual underlying mechanisms. Salinity stress reduces the redox homeostasis thereby hampering the redox-dependent cellular functions like electron transport and energy generation [45,49]. BP availability imparted a beneficial impact on the synthesis of secondary metabolites including phenols and flavonoids. Secondary metabolites including phenols and flavonoids are involved in the regulation of auxin transport, photoprotection, mechanical support, seed dispersal, and protection against insect herbivory [42,50]. Secondary metabolites including flavonoids prevent oxidative damage by inhibiting the formation of ROS and protect cellular functioning by scavenging radicals like superoxide [37].

Effects of banana peel application and salinity on leaf nutrient content

Saline irrigation water and BP addition significantly affected leave tissue in all ionic concentrations (Table 5). The increasing BP level from 0 to 15 t ha-1 with non-saline irrigation, significantly increased P, Zn, Mg, K, and Iron in leave from 19.8 to 31.1 g kg-1, 66.2 to 75.3 mg kg-1, 338.7 to 386.1 mg kg-1, 4365.6 to 5456.2 mg kg-1, 87.6 to 98.6 mg kg-1 respectively and significantly decreased Na from 5.33 to 3.89 g kg-1. Application of BP at 15 t ha-1 with saline irrigation at 200 mM NaCl, showed an increase at 49.1%, 14.63%, 19.47%, 20.68%, and 12.06% respectively in P, Zn, Mg, K, and Iron and reduced at 28.44% in Na. The salt stress x BP interaction had a significant (p < 0.05) effect on Na, P, Mg, Zn, K, and Iron in leave tissue. The Na concentrations in the leaves increased with saline irrigation water whereas P, Mg, Zn, K, and Iron uptake by leaves reduced with saline irrigation and irrespective of the BP fertilization.

Table 5: Effects of banana peel rates on mineral components of jute potager (Corchorus olitorius L.) under salt stress (14 WAS).
Leaf mineral components
Treatment (mM NaCl) BP
(t ha-1)
P
(g kg-1)
Zn
(mg kg-1)
Mg
(mg kg-1)
K
(mg kg-1)
Iron
(mg kg-1)
Na
(g kg-1)
  Control 0 19.8 ± 0.02r 66.2 ± 0.71l 338.7 ± 2.24e 4365.6 ± 4.12b 87.6 ± 0.12i 5.33 ± 0.11tu
NPK 22.8 ± 0.02r 68.7 ± 0.71l 347.4 ± 2.24e 4468.6 ± 4.12ab 89.9 ± 0.12i 5.07 ± 0.21tu
5 21.3 ± 0.03r 67.1 ± 0.82l 351.3 ± 3.01e 4460.4 ± 4.16ab 88.8 ± 0.16i 5.21 ± 0.18tu
10 25.7 ± 0.02q 70.9 ± 0.81l 368.5 ± 3.21e 4891.2 ± 4.23a 93.2 ± 0.23h 4.91 ± 0.17u
15 31.1 ± 0.04q 75.3 ± 0.93k 386.1 ± 3.33e 5456.2 ± 3.41a 98.6 ± 0.41h 3.89 ± 0.21u
  50 0 15.5 ± 0.03s 57.8 ± 0.88m 302.6 ± 2.67f 3612.5 ± 4.21bc 76.5 ± 0.21k 8.45 ± 0.12t
NPK 17.8 ± 0.02rs 59.2 ± 0.71m 313.3 ± 2.24f 3742.6 ± 4.12b 77.1 ± 0.12k 7.51 ± 0.61t
5 16.6 ± 0.06s 58.6 ± 0.76m 321.3 ± 2.34f 3703.6 ± 3.32b 77.9 ± 0.32k 7.75 ± 0.59t
10 18.4 ± 0.04r 60.7 ± 0.67m 334.4 ± 2.88f 3918.5 ± 4.82b 79.7 ± 0.28k 6.68 ± 0.53t
15 25.2 ± 0.05q 64.6 ± 0.59lm 349.5 ± 3.45f 4127.5 ± 4.51b 83.4 ± 0.25j 5.47 ± 0.047tu
  100 0 12.9 ± 0.2s 49..5 ± 0.62n 241.3 ± 3.12g 3017.5 ± 4.17c 68.6 ± 0.17l 11.22 ± 0.51s
NPK 13.8 ± 0.02s 50.2 ± 0.71n 258.3 ± 2.24g 3187.6 ± 3.12c 69.6 ± 0.12l 10.31 ± 0.63st
5 12.8 ± 0.07s 51.6 ± 0.73n 244.3 ± 2.88g 3122.1 ± 3.44c 69.5 ± 0.44m 10.63 ± 0.79st
10 14.3 ± 0.07s 53.6 ± 0.75n 262.9 ± 4.01g 3301.5 ± 3.59c 71.7 ± 0.59k 9.13 ± 0.14t
15 18.8 ± 0.03r 57.1 ± 0.82m 296.7 ± 3.45g 3601.5 ± 3.38bc 75.6 ± 038k 7.95 ± 0.46t
  200 0 8.5 ± 0.06t 38.5 ± 0.78p 216.2 ± 2.66g 2382.7 ± 2.58d 56.1 ± 0.58mn 19.51 ± 0.55r
NPK 10.8 ± 0.02st 40.2 ± 0.71op 228.3 ± 2.24g 2510.6 ± 2.12d 58.2 ± 0.12m 18.72 ± 0.41r
5 9.7 ± 0.72t 39.6 ± 0.84p 221.6 ± 2.33g 2492.4 ± 2.62d 57.1 ± 0.62m 18.37 ± 0.61r
10 12.5 ± 0.03s 42.4 ± 0.79o 242.4 ± 3.04g 2658.5 ± 2.49d 59.2 ± 0.49m 16.55 ± 0.52s
15 16.7 ± 0.04s 45.1 ± 0.76o 268.5 ± 3.23g 3004.1 ± 2.76c 63.8 ± 0.76m 13.96 ± 0.41s
Two-way ANOVA results
Salt stress (SS) * * * * * *
Banana peel (BP) * * * * * *
Interaction BP x SS * * * * * *
Values shown are means (n = 5) ± SD; within columns, means followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
**, * significant at 1 and 5% probability levels, respectively, NS not significant.

Modification of organic fertilizers has assisted in the reduction of sodium and chlorine content in leaves regardless of saline and non-saline water irrigation and balanced the sodium-induced toxicity [51,52]. It is reported that the addition of organic fertilizer declined the uptake of sodium and chlorine ions by enhancing the availability of other crucial ions such as potassium, zinc, iron, nitrogen, and phosphorus for the whole plant [42]. The reduction in the potassium percentage in the leaves from the reverse relationships between it and sodium concentration and an increase of the sodium concentration in the soil solution by the irrigation with salty brings the removal of potassium from the absorption area in the roots, the deterioration in the balance of nutrition and reduction of its absorption [53,54] mentioned that the addition of organic matter declines the sodium percentage because organic matter stores a part of sodium in the form of a Na-Organic compound. Similarly [12], experimented to study the soil amendments with organic matter significantly increased the nutrient uptake of rice cultivars under saline conditions leading to plant salt tolerance improvement.

From this study, 15 t ha-1 of BP was better for growth, leaf yield, ascorbic acid, total phenolic, leaf relative water content, and ions content than other treatments for jute production.

Organic fertilizers are important for the environment and represent a favorable and renewable cheap source for agricultural practices. The application of banana peel under salt stress appeared to be favorable for the agro-morphological, physiological, and chemical processes of the jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). From the results presented herein, it could be concluded that the application of banana peel could effectively increase the growth and yield parameters, TFC, ASA content, LRWC, chlorophyll, P, Iron, Zn, K and Mg accumulation, in addition to reducing SP, TP, TSS, MDA content and Na accumulations of jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) plants, under salt stress and the best result was observed at 15 t ha-1. Interestingly, in the current study, even though all of the BP components improved salt tolerance, the manure effect was more evident than that of the other organic manures under salt stress. Therefore, it could be recommended to use banana peel as it can effectively improve metabolic and physiological processes in jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) plants which might lead to increased salt stress tolerance.

We appreciate all who helped us to carry out this study.

  1. Islam MS, Saito JA, Emdad EM, Ahmed B, Islam MM, Halim A, et al. Comparative genomics of two jute species and insight into fiber biogenesis. Nat Plants. 2017;3:1–7. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nplants2016223
  2. Isuosuo CC, Akaneme FI, Abu NE. Nutritional evaluation of the seeds of Corchorus olitorius: a neglected and underutilized species in Nigeria. Pak J Nutr. 2019;18:692–703. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2019.692.703
  3. Sanyaolu VT, Sanyaolu AAA, Fadele E. Spatial variation in heavy metal residue in Corchorus olitorius cultivated along a major highway in Ikorodu-Lagos, Nigeria. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 2011;15:283–287. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v15i2.68511
  4. Lee YH, Choo C, Watawana MI, Jayawardena N, Waisundara VY. An appraisal of eighteen commonly consumed edible plants as functional food based on their antioxidant and starch hydrolase inhibitory activities. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95(14):2956–2964. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7039
  5. Zakaria ZA, Somchit MN, Zaiton H, Jais AMM, Sulaiman MR, Farah WO, et al. The in vitro antibacterial activity of Corchorus olitorius extracts. Int J Pharmacol. 2006;2:213–215. Available from: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20063081118
  6. Azuma K, Nakayama M, Koshioka M, Ippoushi K, Yamaguchi Y, Kohata K, et al. Phenolic antioxidants from the leaves of Corchorus olitorius L. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47(10):3963–3966. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990347p
  7. Abo KA, Fred-jaiyesimi AA, Jaiyesimi AE. Ethnobotanical studies of medicinal plants used in the management of diabetes mellitus in South Western Nigeria. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;115(1):67–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.09.005
  8. Wang SY, Bunce JA, Maas JL. Elevated carbon dioxide increases contents of antioxidant compounds in field-grown strawberries. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51(15):4315–4320. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf021172d
  9. Al Batran R, Al-bayaty F, Abdulla MA, Al-Obaidi MJ, Hajrezaei M, Hassandarvish P, et al. Gastroprotective effects of Corchorus olitorius leaf extract against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal hemorrhagic lesions in rats. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:1321–1329. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.12229
  10. Hussein S, Shaukat M, Ashraf M, Zhu C, Jin Q, Zhang J. Salinity stress in arid and semiarid climates: Effects and management in field crops. In: Climate Change and Agriculture. 2019;123–145. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/68075
  11. Almodares A, Hadi MR, Dosti B. The effects of salt stress on growth parameters and carbohydrate contents in sweet sorghum. Res J Environ Sci. 2008;2(4):298–304. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2008.298.304
  12. Mbarki S, Skalicky M, Talbi O, Chakraborty A, Hnilicka F, Hejnak V, et al. Performance of Medicago sativa grown in clay soil favored by compost or farmyard manure to mitigate salt stress. Agron. 2020;10(1):94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010094
  13. Bidabadi SS, Dehghanipoodeh S, Wright GC. Vermicompost leachate reduces some negative effects of salt stress in pomegranate. Int J Recycling Org Waste Agric. 2017;6:255-263. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-017-0173-7
  14. Ahmed BO, Inoue M, Moritani S. Effect of saline water irrigation and manure application on the available water content, soil salinity, and growth of wheat. Agric Water Manag. 2010;97:165-170. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.09.001
  15. Aina OE, Amoo SO, Mugivhisa LL, Olowoyo JO. Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of tomato. Appl Ecol Env Res. 2019;17:3681-3694. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1702_36813694
  16. Baddour AG, Rashwan E, El-Sharkawy TA. Effect of organic manure, antioxidant, and proline on corn (Zea mays L.) grown under saline conditions. Environ Bio Soil Sec. 2017;203–217. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21608/jenvbs.2018.2513.1021
  17. Kumar KPS, Bhowmik D, Duraivel S, Umadevi M. Traditional and medicinal uses of banana. J Pharmacogn Phytochem. 2012;1:51. Available from: https://www.phytojournal.com/vol1Issue3/Issue_sept_2012/9.1.pdf
  18. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. University of California, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station, Baltimore, USA. 1950. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1850958
  19. Walkley A, Black IA. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29-38. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  20. Okalebo JR, Gathua WK, Woomer PL. Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: a working manual. Soil Biology and Fertility, Soil Science Society of East Africa, Kari, UNESCO-ROSTA Nairobi, Kenya. 1993;88. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2505600
  21. Hand MJ, Nono GV, Taffouo VD, Youmbi E. Nutrient composition, antioxidant components, and ascorbic acid content response of pepper fruit (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars grown under salt stress. Open Access Library J. 2021;8:e6830:1–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1106830
  22. Taleisnik E, Peyrano G, Arias C. Response of Chloris gayana cultivars to salinity. 1. Germination and early vegetative growth. Trop Grassl. 1997;31:232-240. Available from: https://www.tropicalgrasslands.info/public/journals/4/Historic/Tropical%20Grasslands%20Journal%20archive/PDFs/Vol_31_1997/Vol_31_03_97_pp232_240.pdf
  23. Metwally SA, Khalid KA, Abou-Leila BH. Effect of water regime on the growth, flower yield, essential oil, and proline contents of Calendula officinalis. Nusantara Biosci. 2013;5(2):65-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n050203
  24. Kumar N, Krishnamoorty V, Nalina L, Soorianathasundharam K. A new factor for estimating total leaf area in bananas. InfoMusa. 2002;11:42–43. Available from: https://eurekamag.com/research/003/623/003623277.php?srsltid=AfmBOopbO2KwWg5ehMmdW7mqKK71-CLvgSkiQxsyRoDazO3Dfvr87KvQ
  25. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans. 1983;11:591–592. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313724134_Determination_of_total_carotenoids_and_chlorophylls_a_and_b_of_leaf_in_different_solvents
  26. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem. 1956;28:350–356. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
  27. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–254. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1976.9999
  28. Seckin B, Sekmen AH, Türkan S. An enhancing effect of exogenous mannitol on the antioxidant enzyme activities in roots of wheat under salt stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2009;28:12–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00344-008-9068-1
  29. Gossett DR, Millhollon EP, Lucas MC. Antioxidant response to NaCl stress in salt tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of cotton. Crop Sci. 1994;34:706–714. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400030020x
  30. Gahler S, Otto K, Bohm V. Alterations of Vitamin C, total phenolics, and antioxidant capacity as affected by processing tomatoes to different products. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:7962–7968. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf034743q
  31. Marigo G. On a fractionation method and estimation of the phenolic compounds in plants. Analysis. 1973;2:106–110. Available from: https://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=PASCAL7332009482
  32. Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10:178–182. Available from: https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2748
  33. Abreu CA. Comparison of analysis methods to assess the availability of metals in soils. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 1995;19:463–468.
  34. Malavolta E, Vitti GC, Oliveira SA. Assessment of the nutritional status of plants: principles and applications. 2nd ed. Piracicaba, SP: POTAFOS; 1997. 319. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2937675
  35. Pauwels JM, Van Ranst E, Verloo M, Mvondo ZA. Analysis methods of major plant elements. Pedology Laboratory Manual: Methods of Plants and Soil Analysis. AGCD, Brussels. 1992;28: Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2937676
  36. Hand MJ, Abib CF, Ousman S, Tabi KM, Oumarou B, Taffouo VD, et al. Influence of different rates of salinity on flowering, yield and fruit nutritional value of three okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] cultivars in far North Region of Cameroon. Plant. 2024;12(3):66–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20241203.13
  37. Abou El-Magd MM, Zaki MF, Abou-Hussein SD. Effect of organic manure and different levels of saline irrigation water on growth, green yield, and chemical content of sweet fennel. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2008;2(1):90–98. Available from: https://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2008/90-98.pdf
  38. Hand MJ, Nassourou M, Nono GV, Taffouo VD, Youmbi E. Organic and inorganic nutrient sources influenced growth, flowering, fruition, fruit relative water content, and yield of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars under salinity in coastal region of Cameroon. Int J Agron Agric Res. 2021;18(5):33–51. Available from: https://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/IJAAR-V18-No5-p33-51.pdf
  39. Acosta-Motos JR, Ortuño MF, Bernal-Vicente A, Diaz-Vivancos P, Sanchez-Blanco MJ, Hernandez JA. Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms. Agron. 2017;7(1):18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7010018
  40. Dineshkumar R, Subramanian J, Arumugam A, Rasheeq AA, Sampathkumar P. Exploring the microalgae biofertilizer effect on onion cultivation by field experiment. Waste Biomass Valori. 2018;1–11. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12649-018-0466-8
  41. Hand MJ, Nouck AE, Nassourou AM, Abib CF, Tonfack LB, Taffouo VD, et al. Influence of salt stress on growth, leaf pigmentation, ionic distribution, and metabolites accumulation of Talinum triangulare (Jacq.) Willd. leafy vegetables as affected by different cassava peel levels. J Adv Res Food Agric Environ Sci. 2022;8(9):1–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.53555/nnfaes.v8i9.1419
  42. Zhu G, Chen Y, Ella ES, Ismail AM. Mechanisms associated with tiller suppression under stagnant flooding in rice. J Agron Crop Sci. 2019;205:235–247. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12316
  43. Henry EE, Sossa E, Noumavo AP, Amadji G, Baba-Moussa L, Gandonou CB. Ions and organic solutes as implicated in the ameliorative effect of the exogenous application of calcium on salt-stressed tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2021;33(18):200–212. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2021/v33i1830590
  44. Loko B, Montcho KDH, Agbossékpé F, Mensah ACG, Assogba-Komlan F, Lutts S, et al. Response of African basil (Ocimum gratissimum L.) to salt stress under tropical conditions in the Republic of Benin: growth, ions, and organic solutes accumulation. Int J Plant Soil Sci. 2022;34(17):47–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i1731035
  45. Shahid MA, Sarkhosh A, Khan N, Balal RM, Ali S, Rossi L, et al. Insights into the physiological and biochemical impacts of salt stress on plant growth and development. Agron. 2020;10:938. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10070938
  46. Ahanger MA, Agarwal RM. Salinity stress-induced alterations in antioxidant metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L) as influenced by potassium supplementation. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;115:449–460. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.04.017
  47. Singh R, Upadhyay AK, Singh DP. Regulation of oxidative stress and mineral nutrient status by selenium in arsenic-treated crop plant Oryza sativa. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;148:105–113. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035752
  48. Anjum NA, Gill R, Kaushik M, Hasanuzzaman M, Pereira E, Ahmad I, et al. ATP-sulfurylase, sulfur compounds, and plant stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:210. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00210
  49. Commisso M, Toffali K, Strazzer P, Stocchero M, Ceoldo S, Baldan B, et al. Impact of phenylpropanoid compounds on heat stress tolerance in carrot cell cultures. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1439. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01439
  50. Jabeen N, Ahmad R. Growth response and nitrogen metabolism of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to vermicompost and biogas slurry under salinity stress. J Plant Nutr. 2017;40(1):104–114. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1201495
  51. Gouveitcha MBG, Kpinkoun JK, Mensah ACG, Gandonou GCB. Salinity resistance strategy of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) cultivars produced in Benin Republic. Int J Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;13:19–29. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPPB2021.0308
  52. Loko B, Henry EEY, Prodjinoto H, Gouveitcha MBG, Gandonou CB. Response of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius L.) salt-stressed plants to external application of calcium and potassium. Int J Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;14(1):1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPPB2022.0316
  53. Burhan AK, AL-Taey DK. Effect of potassium humate, humic acid, and compost of rice wastes in the growth and yield of two cultivars of dill under salt stress conditions. Adv Nat Appl Sci. 2018;12(11):1–6. Available from: https://www.aensiweb.net/AENSIWEB/anas/anas/2018/November/1-6(1).pdf