Fluorinated nematicides: Novel classes in the way
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The demand on non- fumigant nematicides was strongly increased in the last few years, and this interesting in nematicides are due to farmers are needed for safer pesticides and increasing of the regulatory pressure on many of the traditional nematicides. The control of plant parasitic nematodes with synthetic nematicides is the most widespread and preferred method, but not always effective enough. The most of synthetic nematicides especially non-fumigants are high toxic to non-target organisms. Thus, Novel non-fumigant nematicides were appeared as alternatives.
The group of trifluoromethyl contains both fluensulfone and fluopyram which are different in mode of action than traditional nematicides as organophosphate and carbamate. Meanwhile, results indicated that fluensulfone and fluopyram are promising nematicides. These new nematicides are very different from traditional nematicides; they are more selective, less toxic and safer to use.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2021 Khalil MS, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Journal of Plant Science and Phytopathology is committed in making it easier for people to share and build upon the work of others while maintaining consistency with the rules of copyright. In order to use the Open Access paradigm to the maximum extent in true terms as free of charge online access along with usage right, we grant usage rights through the use of specific Creative Commons license.
License: Copyright © 2017 - 2025 | 
Open Access by Journal of Plant Science and Phytopathology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at Heighten Science Publications Inc.
With this license, the authors are allowed that after publishing with the journal, they can share their research by posting a free draft copy of their article to any repository or website.
Compliance 'CC BY' license helps in:
| Permission to read and download | ✓ |
| Permission to display in a repository | ✓ |
| Permission to translate | ✓ |
| Commercial uses of manuscript | ✓ |
'CC' stands for Creative Commons license. 'BY' symbolizes that users have provided attribution to the creator that the published manuscripts can be used or shared. This license allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author.
Please take in notification that Creative Commons user licenses are non-revocable. We recommend authors to check if their funding body requires a specific license.
Khalil MS, Darwesh DM. Some integrated practices to manage root-knot nematodes on tomatoes: A Mini Review. Innovat Techniq Agric. 2018; 3: 618-625.
Abd El-Aziz MH, Khalil MS. Antiviral and Antinematodal potentials of chitosan: Review. J Plant Sci Phytopathol. 2000; 4: 55-59. https://www.plantsciencejournal.com/fulltext/jpsp/jpsp-aid1051.php
Desaeger JA, Watson TT. Evaluation of new chemical and biological nematicides for managing Meloidogyne javanica in tomato production and associated double-crops in Florida. Pest Manag Sci. 2019; 75: 3363-3370. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31074102/
Faske TR, Hurd K. Sensitivity of Meloidogyne incognita and Rotyenchulus reniformis to fluopyram. J Nematol. 2015; 47: 316–321. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26941460/
Morris KA, Langston DB, Dickson DW, Davies RF, Timper P, et al. Efficacy of fluensulfone in a tomato‐cucumber double cropping system. J Nematol. 2016; 47: 310–315. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26941459/
Morris KA, Langston DB, Davis RF, Noe JP, Dickson, et al. Efficacy of various application methods of fluensulfone for managing root‐knot nematodes in vegetables. J Nematology. 2016; 48: 65–71. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27418698/
Oka Y, Shuker S, Tkachi N. Nematicidal efficacy of MCW-2, a new nematicide of the fluoroalkenyl group, against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica. Pest Manage. 2009; Sci. 65: 1082–1089. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19488996/
Jeanmart S, Edmunds EF, Lamberth C, Pouliot M. Synthetic approaches to the 2010-2014 new agrochemicals. Bioorg Med Chem. 2016; 24: 317-341. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26725441/
Maienfisch P, Edmunds AJF. Thiazole and isothiazole ring containing compounds in crop protection. In: Advances in Heterocyclic Chemistry. (edS. E.F.V. Scriven and C.A. Ramsden), 2017; 21: 35–88.
Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority. Evaluation of the new active Fluensulfone in the product Nimitz 480 EC nematicide. 2015. http://apvma.gov.au/node/15611.
Dent JA, Smith MM, Vassilatis DK, Avery L. The genetics of ivermectin resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. U.S.A. 2000; 97: 2674–2679. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10716995/
Lai MT, Liu LD, Liu HW. J Am Chem Soc. 1991; 113: 7388–7397.
Dakoji S, Shin I, Becker DF, Stankovich MT, Liu H, et al. Studies of Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Catalyzed Allylic Isomerization: A One-Base or Two-Base Mechanism? J Am Chem Soc. 1996; 118: 10971–10979.
Mansoorabadi SO, Thibodaux CJ, Liu HW. The diverse roles of flavin coenzymes--nature's most versatile thespians. J Org Chem. 2007; 72: 6329–6342. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17580897/
Kearn J, Ludlow E, Dillon J, O'Connor V, Holden-Dye L, et al. Fluensulfone is a nematicide with a mode of action distinct from anticholinesterases and macrocyclic lactones. Pesticides Biochem Physiol. 2014; 109: 44–57. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24581383/
Pitterna T, Boeger M, Maienfisch P. gem-Difluorovinyl Derivatives as Insecticides and Acaricides. Chimia. 2004; 58: 108–116.
Dahlin P, Eder R, Consoli E, Krauss J, Kiewnick S. Integrated control of Meloidogyne incognita in tomatoes using fluopyram and Purpureocillium lilacinum strain 251. Crop Protection. 2019; 124: 1-7.
Yue X, Li F, Wang B. Activity of four nematicides against Meloidogyne incognita race 2 on tomato plants. J Phytopathol. 2000; 168: 399-404.
Oka Y, Berson M, Barazani A. Proceedings, 5th International Congress of Nematology (13–18 July), Brisbane, Australia. 2008; 313–314.
Rieck H, Coqueron PY. Modern Crop Protection Compounds, Insecticides, Vol. 3 (eds. W. Krämer, U. Schirmer, P. Jeschke and M. Witschel), Weinheim, Germany: Wiley‐VCH. 2012; 639–645.
McDougall P. Industry Overview (Market). 2014. https://www.phillipsmcdougall.com/home
Clarke ED, Delaney JS. Physical and Molecular Properties of Agrochemicals: An Analysis of Screen Inputs, Hits, Leads, and Products Chimia. 2003; 57: 731–734.
Broeksma A, Puetzkuhl K, Lamprecht S, Fuersch H. Velum®‐ An evolutionary nematicide for efficient crop production. J Nematol. 2014; 46: 140–141.
Luemmen P, Huang LS, Lisse D, Berry EA. 248th ACS National Meeting & Exposition (10–14 August 2014), San Francisco, CA, USA. Abstracts of Papers, AGRO‐131. 2014.
Burrows PR, Kerry BR, Perry RN. J Zool Lond. 1994; 232: 341–346.
Slaats BE. Investigations on the efficacy of encapsulation of the endoparasitic fungus Hirsutella rhossiliensis for control of plant‐parasitic nematodes. Gottingen: V & R Uni press GmbH. 2008; 135.
Bayer Crop Science. Press release. 2009. http://www.bayercropscience.com
Bayer Crop Science News Release 2015. http://news.agropages.com/News/